I was in church on Sunday and the question of freedom arose in the course of the sermon and two responses caught my attention the first person who i think is a cynic in the making said in a rather heartfelt way that freedom as a state, was impossible to attain as long as responsibilities existed and one had several social conventions to conform to. the other person said freedom was achievable and claimed to have achieved it as it comprised the liberty to do all that one wanted what is most significant about these two definitions or outlooks of freedom is that the people that gave them are essentially in the same age bracket and economic status so it bring into discussion that freedom, is as it appears or as a friend of mine says; freedom is as freedom does.
It now calls into question what exactly is freedom? what does one do so as to be described as free? to a slave freedom is the liberty to determine what he does each day, a caged bird defines it as the breaking of the bars and the ability to find out how far the sky goes, to a teenager it is the transfer of prerogative from his parents to him/her self and the free rein to choose what he would do, basically to live a life bereft of "interference", control, restrictions and advice. for some others it could mean the ability to do something they have always wanted to do for example to a housewife it could mean being able to just take a long overdue sleep or just be rid of all the responsibility that she has for one day. it really depends on who is speaking.
Be that as it may the thread that runs through all of these definitions is the word or concept choice; the ability to see the options available to one, and the levity to go after that which enables the person to achieve his/her aims or dreams.
If its as simple as choice, why are the views so different? the answer is simple; we all want different things but we all want to able to say this is what i want and i have taken it.
In my opinion freedom is the liberty to pursue ones aims within his available means and maximizing what means he has within sensible restrictions and to understand the responsibilities that come with it. "sensible" is in it self ambiguous enough to elicit another argument of relativity. but i absolutely believe that freedom as an aim cannot be fully appreciated within certain restrictions.
A hero is someone who understands the responsibility that comes with his freedom.freedom without any restrictions is slavery of another sort one more insidious that other forms of slavery, as it places the "freed" person in a bondage to the things he wants or thinks he wants. let me use this analogy to press home my point.
Bob Dylan
Look at these two insects the butterfly and the bee. ever wondered why despite all the flowers that the butterfly flits from it leaves nothing to enjoy apart from it beauty? the butterfly is the typical example of freedom the liberty to pursue all pleasures a hedonistic lifestyle is if you please. essentially, the butterfly just goes about "loving" this flower and then that one, spends its night thinking of all the other flowers it expects to explore tomorrow and before it knows it, it life time is over and there is nothing to show for it except its beauty and another young butterfly. At the other end of this spectrum in the honey bee which most of us are grateful to for the gift of honey. it lives in a hive and has a rigid hierarchy each bee has a specific task which it sticks to. you could argue that it is in a bondage of sorts but i will argue that it is not because, it has the liberty to be the best of its kind and contribute ultimately to the production of honey that most of us love. picture this; same environment, probably same flower, clearly not the same aesthetic quality, different amounts of "freedom" but at the end of the day the disparity in end product is beyond question.


As Christians what does the bible have to say about freedom or even choice, it is important to note that man was created as a being with free choice at liberty to do "all" and have dominion over everything that God created after enjoying the freedom of choice with the restriction of the tree in the center of the garden, when the choose to push his boundaries, the lost everything although you could argue that he possessed the freedom that information or knowledge provided him with, his life wasn't particularly better. this is the bible's perspective on freedom;
Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live! 20You can make this choice by loving the Lord your God, obeying him, and committing yourself firmly to him. Thisb is the key to your life. Deut 30vs 19 New Living Translationagain Jesus emphasizes the place of "restrictions" ;
God gives us freedom, however its a unique kind that can only be found in him we can achieve all our dreams within him because he is all sufficient.GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)Place my yoke over your shoulders, and learn from me, because I am gentle and humble. Then you will find rest for yourselves
another case in point is the prodigal son in Luke 15vs11 is parable of Jesus that poignantly elucidates that freedom isn't really all that it is made out to be. from all of the above, the question of the need to be free goes without saying, but when we ask how much freedom do we really need is one that brings out all sorts of questions and opinions. these are essentially my opinion's based on my search of the scriptures and personal experience. let me know what you think on the subject of freedom.New International Version (©1984)'For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, 'We are his offspring.'
have a nice week y'all.
PS.don't forget to let me know what you think i 'll really appreciate it.









